From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project |
Date: | 2011-10-24 18:24:36 |
Message-ID: | j84agp$6u1$1@dough.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tomas Vondra wrote on 24.10.2011 20:11:
> On 24 Říjen 2011, 19:44, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>> Pavel Stehule wrote on 24.10.2011 12:19:
>>> there is not clean who is customer and what is one unit. If you
>>> distribute PostGIS inside your application as one unit to customer,
>>> then your application should to use GPL.
>>
>> So if we only distribute our application and require the customer to
>> install Postgres and PostGIS, then it shold be fine?
>
> I think you should actually read GPL license, because you're obviously
> confused by how it works - especially note the notion of "derived work".
>
> Derived work means that you take a GPL licensed software and modify it. In
> this case you're required to distribute the source code (again under GPL)
> to those who received the binary (legally). In case of PostGIS this would
> mean you modify the PostGIS source code itself, which is very unlikely I
> guess.
Thanks.
My understanding of "derived work" was, that anything that was "compiled" against a GPL licensed piece of software and thus will *only* run with that software is considered "derived". If derived work only applies to changes of the original software, then this is of course no problem.
Regards
Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Allan Kamau | 2011-10-24 19:23:28 | Help with copy (loading TSV file into table as text) |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-10-24 18:11:57 | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project |