From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project |
Date: | 2011-10-24 07:31:16 |
Message-ID: | j8346m$9hu$1@dough.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Eduardo Morras, 21.10.2011 20:53:
>> Now PostGIS is licensed under the GPL and I wonder if we can use it
>> in a commercial (customer specific) project then. The source code
>> will not be made open source, but of course the customer will get
>> the source code.
>>
>> Is it still OK to use the GPL licensed PostGIS in this case? Is
>> that then considered a derivative work because the application will
>> not work without PostGIS?
>
> If it's pure GPL, then postgresql is automagically relicenced to GPL,
> because postgresql allows relicencing and GPL force it to be GPL.
> Your source code must be in GPL too. Remember, it's a virus licence
> and has the same problem that Midas king had.
Thanks for the answer.
I think we'll better be safe than sorry and we will not use PostGIS then.
Regards
Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | robert rottermann | 2011-10-24 07:42:18 | Re: PostGIS in a commercial project |
Previous Message | Javier Amor garcia | 2011-10-24 07:27:36 | Error inserting RFC1738-encoded URLs |