From: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4 |
Date: | 2011-09-14 14:38:23 |
Message-ID: | j4qe8v$e7c$1@dough.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 14/09/2011 09:30, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> On 14/09/11 12:56, Andy Colson wrote:
>> On 09/13/2011 08:15 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Some months ago, I ran some (probably naive) benchmarks looking at how
>>> pgbench performed on an identical system with differing filesystems.
>>> (on Linux).
>>>
> [snip]
>>
>> Did you test unplugging the power cable in the middle of a test to see
>> which would come back up?
>
> Heh, no, but it'd be interesting to see..
>
> I wonder if turning a virtual machine off has the same effect?
No, never the exact same effect.
There are two things to consider: if/when/how the OS flushes the data to
the hardware and if/when/how the hardware flushes the data to physical
storage. You can simulate only the failure of the first part with a
virtual machine, but not the second (unless you bring down the VM host...).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antonio Vieiro | 2011-09-14 15:58:58 | Re: Bit datatype performance? |
Previous Message | pasman pasmański | 2011-09-14 14:21:36 | Re: Bit datatype performance? |