From: | <pmagnoli(at)systemevolution(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? |
Date: | 2005-12-08 11:10:00 |
Message-ID: | ir6f0o.ipkeuk@mail.systemevolution.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I can only add that patched code did not build on windows, contacted author
about that and never got an answer back.
Regards
paolo
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> ha scritto
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Anyone remember this patch?
> > http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/
> > The discussion seems to be pretty minimal:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00859.php
> > Does anyone see a need to investigate it further?
>
> I had hoped to see some comments from the Slony people about it.
> I'd feel better about the validity of a set of hooks if more than
> one project agreed that it was useful/appropriate ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-12-08 11:10:28 | Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints |
Previous Message | Dmitry Karasik | 2005-12-08 10:33:09 | implement prepared queries in plperl |