Re: How to refer to computed columns from other computed columns?

From: Matthew Wilson <matt(at)tplus1(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to refer to computed columns from other computed columns?
Date: 2010-08-16 17:49:14
Message-ID: i4btmq$unq$1@dough.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon Aug 16 10:26:36 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthew Wilson <matt(at)tplus1(dot)com> writes:
>> All I can come up with so far is to use a view and then another view on
>> top of that one:
>
> Note that you don't actually need a view, as you can just write the
> subselect in-line:
>
> select a, b, c,
> case when c < 0 then 'no'
> else 'yes'
> end as d
> from (select a, b, a - b as c from foo) as v1;
>
> This is the standard method for avoiding repeat calculations in SQL.
>
> One thing to keep in mind is that the planner will usually try to
> "flatten" a nested sub-select (and whether it was written out manually
> or pulled from a view does not matter here). This will result in the
> sub-select's expressions getting inlined into the parent, so that the
> calculations will actually get done more than once. If you're trying
> to reduce execution time not just manual labor, you may want to put an
> "offset 0" into the sub-select to create an optimization fence. But
> test whether that really saves anything --- if there are bigger joins
> or additional WHERE conditions involved, you can easily lose more than
> you gain by preventing flattening.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Thanks so much for the help!

I don't care if the code is rearranged so that c is replaced with an
inline definition during compilation. I'm not concerned about
efficiency here. I just don't want to have to redefine it manually over
and over again, because I know that as I update how c is defined, I'll
forget to update it everywhere.

Maybe sql needs a preprocessing macro language like C.

<ducks>

Matt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl Denninger 2010-08-16 18:00:47 Re: Encoding change question...
Previous Message Peter C. Lai 2010-08-16 17:46:21 Re: Encoding change question...