From: | Matthew Wilson <matt(at)tplus1(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to refer to computed columns from other computed columns? |
Date: | 2010-08-16 17:49:14 |
Message-ID: | i4btmq$unq$1@dough.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon Aug 16 10:26:36 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthew Wilson <matt(at)tplus1(dot)com> writes:
>> All I can come up with so far is to use a view and then another view on
>> top of that one:
>
> Note that you don't actually need a view, as you can just write the
> subselect in-line:
>
> select a, b, c,
> case when c < 0 then 'no'
> else 'yes'
> end as d
> from (select a, b, a - b as c from foo) as v1;
>
> This is the standard method for avoiding repeat calculations in SQL.
>
> One thing to keep in mind is that the planner will usually try to
> "flatten" a nested sub-select (and whether it was written out manually
> or pulled from a view does not matter here). This will result in the
> sub-select's expressions getting inlined into the parent, so that the
> calculations will actually get done more than once. If you're trying
> to reduce execution time not just manual labor, you may want to put an
> "offset 0" into the sub-select to create an optimization fence. But
> test whether that really saves anything --- if there are bigger joins
> or additional WHERE conditions involved, you can easily lose more than
> you gain by preventing flattening.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Thanks so much for the help!
I don't care if the code is rearranged so that c is replaced with an
inline definition during compilation. I'm not concerned about
efficiency here. I just don't want to have to redefine it manually over
and over again, because I know that as I update how c is defined, I'll
forget to update it everywhere.
Maybe sql needs a preprocessing macro language like C.
<ducks>
Matt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl Denninger | 2010-08-16 18:00:47 | Re: Encoding change question... |
Previous Message | Peter C. Lai | 2010-08-16 17:46:21 | Re: Encoding change question... |