| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator |
| Date: | 2010-04-27 01:55:30 |
| Message-ID: | i2j603c8f071004261855o351595c6xf3e457dabe5dcd57@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. ?Do
>> > we still want to do that?
>>
>> I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for
>> keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the
>> 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time. So
>> I vote for holding off for this release and possibly revisiting at
>> some point down the road.
>
> You might also remember I was outvoted. It will not be hard to put it
> in /contrib as that is already a valid build option for pg_migrator.
[shrug...]
If that's the consensus I'll go along with it, but I'm not excited
about adding more things to our to-do list at this point, even
apparently simple ones.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-27 02:14:20 | Re: pg_migrator |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-27 01:46:15 | Re: pg_migrator |