From: | Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I need your thoughts .... |
Date: | 2010-03-15 08:19:50 |
Message-ID: | hnkqj6$63l$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On 2010-03-14, Didier Gasser-Morlay <didiergm(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am starting to write a new application where I'll need a fairly light
> local database engine when the user is travelling but with the ability to
> connect to a central db server once back in the office. The central server
> will be PostgreSQL, but I have got questions about the local server. I would
> love it to be PostgreSQL, which would simplify a lot of things as although
> the volume of the local database will be fairly small: a few hundreds or
> records on a maximum of 20 tables, but the queries might be complex and the
> benefit of stored procedures if of great value to me.
>
> My constraints are:
> 1- I won't be with the users for the setup
> 2- Ideally I'd like a one-step setup (db and my app), or at least with no
> questions asked (fully automated setup)
It can be done if you use a big enough hammer. at work we chain-load
the old .MSI format installer with some values we've chosen for
passwords etc. it works 99% of the time.
you get problems when the user already has postgres installed,
but they they usually also havethe wrong version installed :(
> 3- the users will be running on Windows and possibly on Mac within 18
> months
should nbot be a problem,
> Is PostgreSQL suited for this especially point 2.
if you can live without the stored procedures and make do with an
embedded database engine like SQLite instead that's make install
easier.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2010-03-15 21:51:27 | Re: PostgreSQL questions |
Previous Message | Daniel Staal | 2010-03-14 15:41:30 | Re: I need your thoughts .... |