Re: optimizing advice

From: Edgardo Portal <egportal2002(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: optimizing advice
Date: 2009-12-01 20:40:36
Message-ID: hf3v04$rho$1@news.eternal-september.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2009-12-01, Rüdiger Sörensen <r(dot)soerensen(at)mpic(dot)de> wrote:
> dear all,
>
> I am building a database that will be really huge and grow rapidly. It
> holds data from satellite observations. Data is imported via a java
> application. The import is organized via files, that are parsed by the
> application; each file hods the data of one orbit of the satellite.
> One of the tables will grow by about 40,000 rows per orbit, there are
> roughly 13 orbits a day. The import of one day (13 orbits) into the
> database takes 10 minutes at the moment. I will have to import data back
> to the year 2000 or even older.
> I think that there will be a performance issue when the table under
> question grows, so I partitioned it using a timestamp column and one
> child table per quarter. Unfortunately, the import of 13 orbits now
> takes 1 hour instead of 10 minutes as before. I can live with that, if
> the import time will not grow sigificantly as the table grows further.
>
> anybody with comments/advice?
>
> tia,
> Ruediger.

Re the apparent performance penalty for your imports...

If you implemented partitions with ON INSERT rules, maybe you could
"turn on & off" inserts into particular partitions as necessary, i.e. create
a RULE while importing a particular range of timestamps, then remove that
rule when you won't be inserting more data for that partition?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vick Khera 2009-12-01 21:57:18 Re: optimizing advice
Previous Message Vick Khera 2009-12-01 20:37:18 Re: Storing images in database for web applications