Re: FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Harris <harmic(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS
Date: 2024-12-10 16:38:56
Message-ID: hebu5bju5k5olnxmqpkxx3ckjfrbgvahynxu5jkvpguu54vwxd@6pzjz4pojq35
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-12-10 11:34:15 -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2024-12-10 12:36:33 +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 7:34 AM Michael Harris <harmic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 2.
> >
> > > # xfs_info /dev/mapper/ippvg-ipplv
> > > meta-data=/dev/mapper/ippvg-ipplv isize=512 agcount=4,
> > agsize=262471424 blks
> > > = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
> > > = crc=1 finobt=0, sparse=0, rmapbt=0
> > > = reflink=0 bigtime=0 inobtcount=0
> > nrext64=0
> >
> > Yay, reflink=0, that's pretty old fs ?!
>
> I think that only started to default to on more recently (2019, plus time to
> percolate into RHEL). The more curious cases is finobt=0 (turned on by default
> since 2015) and to a lesser degree sparse=0 (turned on by default since 2018).

One thing that might be interesting is to compare xfs_info of affected and
non-affected servers...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-12-10 16:52:34 Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again
Previous Message Andres Freund 2024-12-10 16:34:15 Re: FileFallocate misbehaving on XFS