Re: Datatype of domains not reported correctly.

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Datatype of domains not reported correctly.
Date: 2009-08-03 18:11:25
Message-ID: h5798d$b0j$1@ger.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Kris Jurka wrote on 03.08.2009 19:44:
> DISTINCT is the JDBC equivalent term for domains.
>
> See Chapter 16 if the JDBC4 spec.
>
> DISTINCT type - a user-defined type based on a built-in type; for
> example: CREATE TYPE MONEY AS NUMERIC(10,2) FINAL
>
> So I believe we're doing the right thing here, although our support for
> DISTINCT elsewhere is probably lacking.

Thanks for the detailed answer. I have to admit that I didn't check the JDBC spec completely.

If the specs require this, I can live with it - although I think the spec is "wrong" here ;)

Regards
Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sylvain Leroux 2009-08-05 10:01:35 Using BigInteger as argument to AbstractJdbc2Statement.setObject
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2009-08-03 17:44:26 Re: Datatype of domains not reported correctly.