From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: planet "top posters" section |
Date: | 2010-04-14 06:52:12 |
Message-ID: | h2w9837222c1004132352q364eae84s6c1dfda667567a8e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> That would be reasonable too, although it's a little hard to think
>>> about how to apply that to the team section, since the individuals are
>>> listed under the teams. Clearly you could also omit teams with 2 or
>>> fewer postings, but what if the team has >2 but some - or all -
>>> individuals within the team have <=2?
>>
>> Well, that's an incentive to join a team.
>
> Hmm. Well, by that theory, Bruce should quite his job: he'd go from
> somewhere buried down in the weeds to the number one spot on the list.
>
> It's clearly not our policy to give people who are on a team a more
> prominent position. More like the reverse. Personally I think I'd
Yes, if any, the reverse. And we definitely don't want to promote
team-members over individuals. Or I should say, we have traditionally
not wanted to do that. All policies are of course up for discussion
:-)
> favor just listing the top 6-10 posters (regardless of whether they're
> on a team) and the top 6-10 teams (without listing the posters) and
> call it good.
If it doesn't show who's a member of a team, isn't that very confusing?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-14 13:42:48 | Re: planet "top posters" section |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-04-13 22:08:47 | Re: planet "top posters" section |