Re: Replication

From: Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication
Date: 2009-06-23 11:55:31
Message-ID: h1qfrj$ha8$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2009-06-23, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
> With Pg it'd break any existing connections, but any database
> application worth a damn must be able to handle re-issuing transactions
> due to deadlocks, resource exhaustion, admin statement cancellation etc
> anyway.

Any app that dies when the database socket fails will itself earn a
few "Damn!"s from users :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hartman, Matthew 2009-06-23 12:03:21 Explaining functions.
Previous Message Viktor Rosenfeld 2009-06-23 11:48:38 Re: Graphical representation of query plans