Re: Dynamic table

From: Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dynamic table
Date: 2009-06-20 04:14:12
Message-ID: h1hnmk$8i7$2@reversiblemaps.ath.cx
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2009-06-17, A B <gentosaker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Your problem is currently sounding very much like an exam question; you
>> seem to be arbitrarily making decisions without showing any real data.
>> When you deal with real problems in the real world you're normally
>> making compromises when you model things and hence the decisions
>> wouldn't be as forced as you're making it.  Design is about picking and
>> choosing between compromises and without knowing what the choices are
>> you can't design anything, this is one of the problems with tests.
>
> I wish it was just an exam question....
>
> Show real data?
> Well here it is:
>
> customer | value1 | value2 | value3|
> 1 5 3 4
> 2 8 2 10
>
> I hope you can believe me when I say that the names
> value1,value2,value3 really are impossible to relate. I will not
> decide upon those. Someone else is going to do that in the future. I
> just have to make a structure that can handle all cases from "shoe
> size" to "number of atoms in persons body" (well, perhaps I can say
> that the values will be in the 0...100 range, but that's about it.
> There is really nothing else I know about how the system will be used
> by other people. :-( I just know that I have to make them enter data
> like this since it is a third party that need this kind of data.
>
><confession>yes I took some random values for the "real data" since I
> don't know anything else about the data. </confession>

I like the table-per-column approach

And also the array approach, arrays of numbers of the sizes you discuss
are much faster than hard disks

what sorts of querys will be most common

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Uwe C. Schroeder 2009-06-20 04:45:57 Re: Disaster recovery (server died)
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2009-06-20 04:03:07 Re: postgresql-8.3.7 unexpected connection closures