From: | Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sequence Incrementing by 2 insted of 1 |
Date: | 2009-04-28 11:58:20 |
Message-ID: | gt6r0s$kao$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2009-04-28, David <david(at)vanlaatum(dot)id(dot)au> wrote:
> Ok got permission to send the code I think I have got all the relevent bits.
>
>CREATE TABLE currentcall (
> cadc_taskno integer DEFAULT nextval(('currentcall_cadc_taskno_seq'::text)::regclass) NOT NULL,
> coversight character varying(4),
...
>CREATE RULE currentcall_insert AS ON INSERT TO currentcall DO INSERT INTO
> taskchangelog (tasknum, newstatus, newtech, status, newpriority,
> newestcomplete, newclass, newnewtask) VALUES (new.cadc_taskno,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> new.cstatus, new.ctechalloc, new.ccustcomment, new.cfprior,
> new.cestcomplete, new.cjobclass, (new.cnewtask = 'Y'::bpchar));
if you're inserting DEFAULT into the cadc_taskno column (or not
explicitly setting that column) the re-writer will substitute
nextval(('currentcall_cadc_taskno_seq'::text)::regclass)
And that will be evaluated once for the insert and again for the rule.
this is documented somewhere.... I think
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasen Betts | 2009-04-28 12:21:19 | Re: Web + Slicing/Paging datas |
Previous Message | A. Kretschmer | 2009-04-28 11:49:33 | Re: Huge sample dataset for testing. |