| From: | Lew <noone(at)lwsc(dot)ehost-services(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: I don't want to back up index files |
| Date: | 2009-03-21 06:34:42 |
| Message-ID: | gq21q2$ni8$1@news.albasani.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Glen Parker wrote:
> pg_dump is not acceptable to us because of the potential to lose many
> hours of valuable data. Why would pg_dump even be relevant to this
> discussion? PITR offers a benefit that pg_dump does not, a benefit that
> we, and countless other organizations, obviously find useful. Suggesting
> that a person who's been managing PG in a commercial setting since
> version 6.4 should just use pg_dump as an alternative to PITR is, well,
> rather insulting.
Dude, you were the one who started with calling other people's ideas "silly".
To be aggrieved when they respond in kind is, well, silly.
--
Lew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2009-03-21 07:42:26 | Re: Fulltext - multiple single column indexes |
| Previous Message | zach cruise | 2009-03-21 05:39:52 | (odbc) multiple step ole db generated error - date/timestamp column |