From: | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which SQL is the best for servers? |
Date: | 2009-02-17 12:27:01 |
Message-ID: | gneaem$bbs$2@news.motzarella.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Geoff Muldoon wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle says...
>
>>>>>>> The server would run Linux or one of the BSD variant
>>>>>> You also missed DB2, SQL Server and several others.
>>>>> Scrap MSSQL Server as a candidate given the above O/S requirement.
>
>>>> The OS should be picked based on the requirements of the database and
>>>> rest of the system, not vice versa.
>>> In an ideal world, yes.
>
>>> My comments were simply based on the OPs restriction on O/S. There may be
>>> valid non-ideal-world reasons for that restriction.
>
>> More than just ideal world. The higher the requirements, the more
>> important it is. And he has some pretty high requirements.
>
> No wanting to get into a philosophical argument, but ...
>
> Sometimes restrictions are imposed. Hopefully these will NOT conflict
> with the requirements, and in the OP's case there is still acceptable
> remaining flexibility of choice.
>
> My upcoming project will have the RDBMS mandated. I can live with that,
> because the option imposed on me can more than comfortably handle the
> requirements. Is this ideal? No. Are the motives for this imposed
> restriction reasonable in this case? Yes.
>
> Geoff M
If artificial restrictions which affect the success of the project are
imposed, then it's time to get rid of those restrictions.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kusuma Pabba | 2009-02-17 12:54:02 | hi all |
Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2009-02-17 12:19:14 | Re: transfering tables into other schema |