Re: PostgreSQL and eval()

From: Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-general(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-general(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and eval()
Date: 2008-12-10 11:03:35
Message-ID: gho7m9$1gu$1@pye-srv-01.telemetry.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>> Alternatively I appreciate that I could use PL/pgSQL but that would
>> assume that if I sent the sequence of operations to somebody else that
>> he also had it compiled into his server.
>
> Well, pl/pgsql has been automatically included in all recent version of
> PG. You might have to issue "CREATE LANGUAGE plpgsql" in the database
> first (permissions might be an issue I suppose) but that's all.

Thanks, I'd forgotten it was built by default.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steffn 2008-12-10 11:17:56 Re: c function - undefined symbols
Previous Message Erwin Moller 2008-12-10 10:47:58 noobquestion: How does Postgres delete 'smart' when deleting with FK contraints?