| From: | Rainer Bauer <usenet(at)munnin(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Execution-time-sensitive timestamp regression tests |
| Date: | 2008-05-24 22:01:10 |
| Message-ID: | g53h341u0v262l8flqi51jvadg021ou1r6@4ax.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>For the record, what we were talking about was snapshotting the time at
>backend start and then use QueryPerformanceCounter() to see what
>happened and do some calculation.
Although this might not be such a big issue for the regression tests:
Be aware that the reliability of QueryPerformanceCounter() depends on the
hardware: <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274323/en-us>
I used it in Munnin, but there were too many customer machines affected by
this bug so that I had to abandom it. This was a few years ago, but I'm not
sure whether the function can be trusted today (see for example this
performance problem <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/895980/en-us>).
Rainer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre-Yves Strub | 2008-05-25 00:20:05 | Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline |
| Previous Message | Sushant Sinha | 2008-05-24 21:18:57 | Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline |