Re: PgFoundry update?

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PgFoundry update?
Date: 2010-04-01 06:24:47
Message-ID: g2qbddc86151003312324ka666bc4fv18fbaf7f3f58fdb1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 1 April 2010 02:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Are there any plans for a redesign of PgFoundry? It's had the same
> layout
> >> for 6 years and while it may be a valuable resource, it really could do
> with
> >> a new lick of paint.
> >>
> >> What prompted me to mention this was visiting:
> >> http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/
> >>
> >> This is on PgFoundry, but this "man page" was so clear and well
> documented,
> >> a huge contrast to its PgFoundry entry. And the main PostgreSQL site is
> >> very accessible, uncluttered, clear and easy to navigate.
> >>
> >> I see it's based on GForge. Time for an upgrade to the latest version?
> >
> > We would love to update it but we haven't found anyone with enough time
> > to do the job, and there are some customizations we did that we can't
> > remember anymore.
>
> Knowing just some of the history of this issue on this list, I was a
> little afraid someone's head was going to explode when I saw Thom's
> email...
>
> ...Robert
>

And I understand why as I've found the previous conversation.

Thom

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2010-04-04 06:40:06 [www] download page is outdated
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-01 01:55:32 Re: PgFoundry update?