Re: encoding confusion

From: Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: encoding confusion
Date: 2008-06-11 05:35:59
Message-ID: g2no82$28dv$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The data in the longblob field might be text, which could be causing the
confusion. For example, when I look at the data in the longblob field, I
see /n for a newline and when I look at the bytea it is 012.

I can only tell you what happened in the client end, in terms of
corruption. I am using the Thunderbord client. When I clicked on a
message, it didn't show the data and when I looked at the headers, it
was just a big mess. I'm guessing that somehow the newlines didn't work
and the headers and message were overlaid on top of each other.

Richard Huxton wrote:
> Your Python script seems to think it's dealing it's dealing with text
> rather than a stream of bytes too. I'm not a Python programmer, but I'd
> guess it's treating one of the database fields (either MySQL or
> PostgreSQL) as text not bytes. You'll need to check the docs for
> binary-data handling in your Python libraries.
>
> I'm puzzled as to how the data was corrupted with escape_bytea() - I
> can't imagine it would be that difficult for the library to get right.
> I'd be suspicious that the source data wasn't what I thought it was.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhPZD8ACgkQjDX6szCBa+pKkwCfXwzX9iZJl6OS7gji9WXczfy7
T7UAn0sCr+Ut5lbZzXQizC8V3P/Irwrh
=/9bo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2008-06-11 05:58:16 Re: encoding confusion
Previous Message Richard Broersma 2008-06-11 04:06:13 what gives: SELECT INVALID SELECT STATEMENT TO FORCE ODBC DRIVER TO UNPREPARED STATE