Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution

From: Dennis Muhlestein <djmuhlestein(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution
Date: 2008-05-07 15:36:55
Message-ID: fvsian$2b8o$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


>
> 1) RAID1+0 to make one big volume
> 2) RAID1 for OS/apps/etc, RAID1 for database
> 3) RAID1 for OS+xlog, RAID1 for database
> 4) RAID1 for OS+popular tables, RAID1 for rest of database

Lots of good info, thanks for all the replies. It seems to me then,
that the speed increase you'd get from raid0 is not worth the downtime
risk, even when you have multiple servers. I'll start pricing things
out and see what options we have.

Thanks again,
Dennis

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tarcizio Bini 2008-05-07 16:28:04 Query Optimization with Kruskal’s Algorithm
Previous Message Matthew Wakeling 2008-05-07 10:46:27 Re: RAID 10 Benchmark with different I/O schedulers