From: | Cserna Zsolt <csernazs(at)freemail(dot)hu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: sequence scan, but indexed tables |
Date: | 2002-07-22 13:33:54 |
Message-ID: | freemail.20020622153354.85651@fm6.freemail.hu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
[...]
> Then I'd say the planner is making the right decision.
Yes, the cost is cool, if I turn off enable_hashjoin, I get
a very hight cost. But the runtime is smaller (in a bigger
query, which have around 20 row on output, and 2-3 subselect
and 3-4 join).
> > I have postgresql 7.0.3 running on Debian GNU/Linux i386.
>
> You do realize that version is quite ancient?
So, upgrade is strongly recommended? :) Debian package is
not so good, the backup script doesn't work (in an earlier
debian package). I tried to backup the database (I have
daily backup) before upgrading, but restoring from this was
too hard for me, because the postgres server didn't started
(he/she thinks I haven't got backup :).
Regards, and thank you,
Zsolt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Janning Vygen | 2002-07-22 13:39:43 | to_char(0,'FM990D99') = "0." instead of "0" |
Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-07-22 13:00:47 | Re: URGENT! pg_dump doesn't work! |