From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_restore |
Date: | 2007-10-29 18:34:47 |
Message-ID: | fg5947$2bp$1@ger.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote on 29.10.2007 00:55:
> Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Why is it, that pg_dump can use a compressed output directly but pg_dumpall is
>> always using a SQL (i.e. "plain text") output?
>
> The custom and tar formats are not designed to support data from more
> than one database. At some point somebody should probably try to
> improve that situation, but it's not immediately obvious what the
> feature ought to look like.
OK, thanks
> If all you need is compression it's certainly easy enough:
>
> pg_dumpall | gzip >mydump.gz
That's what I'm currently doing ;)
Thanks
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kamiseq | 2007-10-29 19:18:06 | function and passing the table name to be used with SQL stmnt |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-10-29 18:26:29 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL archiving idle database |