From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelem |
Date: | 2020-11-09 21:23:24 |
Message-ID: | fff35eb5-765c-3e60-3a2a-45ba5f88777d@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 11/4/20 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
>
> Convert array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position,
> array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket
> to use anycompatiblearray. This is a simple extension of commit
> 5c292e6b9 to hit some other places where there's a pretty obvious
> gain in usability from doing so.
>
> Ideally we'd also modify other functions taking multiple old-style
> polymorphic arguments. But most of the remainder are tied into one
> or more operator classes, making any such change a much larger can of
> worms than I desire to open right now.
>
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/77675130-89da-dab1-51dd-492c93dcf5d1@postgresfriends.org
>
This patch broke cross-version pg_upgrade testing. I have cured crake
for the moment by having it execute this in the source database:
drop aggregate if exists public.array_cat_accum(anyarray);
drop aggregate if exists public.first_el_agg_any(anyelement);
But I wonder if we really want to make it impossible to upgrade
databases with aggregates that contain these functions?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-09 21:29:46 | Re: pgsql: Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-11-09 18:02:50 | pgsql: Last-minute updates for release notes. |