Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation
Date: 2020-12-23 12:11:04
Message-ID: ff8d6a2d-bd5a-362f-8e93-c4edc8b13f07@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/12/23 11:08, Li Japin wrote:
>
>> On Dec 22, 2020, at 11:13 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com <mailto:masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> ‘B’ means a backend and ‘F’ means a frontend. Maybe as [1] does, we should
>> add the note like "Each is marked to indicate that it can be sent by
>> a frontend (F) and a backend (B)" into the description about each message
>> format for START_REPLICATION.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-message-formats.html <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-message-formats.html>
>
> Thanks for your clarify.  Maybe we should move the "protocol message formats”
> before “stream replication protocol” or referenced it in "stream replication protocol”.

I like the latter. And maybe it's better to reference to also
"53.6. Message Data Types" there because the messages for
START_REPLICATION use the message data types.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-12-23 12:31:08 Re: Fail Fast In CTAS/CMV If Relation Already Exists To Avoid Unnecessary Rewrite, Planning Costs
Previous Message Pavel Borisov 2020-12-23 10:59:51 Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation