From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Confused about stream replication protocol documentation |
Date: | 2020-12-23 12:11:04 |
Message-ID: | ff8d6a2d-bd5a-362f-8e93-c4edc8b13f07@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/12/23 11:08, Li Japin wrote:
>
>> On Dec 22, 2020, at 11:13 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com <mailto:masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>> ‘B’ means a backend and ‘F’ means a frontend. Maybe as [1] does, we should
>> add the note like "Each is marked to indicate that it can be sent by
>> a frontend (F) and a backend (B)" into the description about each message
>> format for START_REPLICATION.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-message-formats.html <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/protocol-message-formats.html>
>
> Thanks for your clarify. Maybe we should move the "protocol message formats”
> before “stream replication protocol” or referenced it in "stream replication protocol”.
I like the latter. And maybe it's better to reference to also
"53.6. Message Data Types" there because the messages for
START_REPLICATION use the message data types.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-12-23 12:31:08 | Re: Fail Fast In CTAS/CMV If Relation Already Exists To Avoid Unnecessary Rewrite, Planning Costs |
Previous Message | Pavel Borisov | 2020-12-23 10:59:51 | Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation |