From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Split xlog.c |
Date: | 2021-11-22 23:11:18 |
Message-ID: | ff82d82b-8905-8f94-740d-da8d52baa6e0@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17/09/2021 06:10, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> recoveryStopReason is always acquired but it is used only after
> archive recovery. I'm not sure about reason for the variable to
> live in that wide context. Couldn't we remove the variable then
> call getRecoveryStopReason() directly at the required place?
Robert commented on the same thing, see my reply there.
> 0002:
>
> heapam.c, clog.c, twophase.c, dbcommands.c doesn't need xlogrecvoer.h.
Cleaned that up in v7, thanks!
>> XLogRecCtl
>
> "Rec" looks like Record. Couldn't we use "Rcv", "Recov" or just
> "Recovery" instead?
I never made that association before, but now I cannot unsee it :-). I
changed it to XLogRecoveryCtl.
>> TimeLineID PrevTimeLineID;
>> TransactionId oldestActiveXID;
>> bool promoted = false;
>> EndOfWalRecoveryInfo *endofwal;
>> bool haveTblspcMap;
>
> This is just a matter of taste but the "endofwal" looks somewhat
> alien in the variables.
Changed to "endOfRecoveryInfo".
>
> xlog.c:
> +void
> +SwitchIntoArchiveRecovery(XLogRecPtr EndRecPtr)
>
> Isn't this a function of xlogrecovery.c? Or rather isn't
> minRecoveryPoint-related stuff of xlogrecovery.c?
Updating the control file is xlog.c's responsibility. There are two
different minRecoveryPoints:
1. xlogrecovery.c has a copy of the minRecoveryPoint from the control
file, so that it knows when we have reached consistency.
2. xlog.c is responsible for updating the minRecoveryPoint in the
control file, after consistency has been reached.
SwitchIntoArchiveRecovery() is called on the transition.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-11-22 23:57:45 | Re: Reduce function call costs on ELF platforms |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2021-11-22 23:10:36 | Re: Split xlog.c |