Re: POC PATCH: copy from ... exceptions to: (was Re: VLDB Features)

On 2024-01-18 16:59, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 4:16 AM torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> On 2024-01-18 10:10, jian he wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 8:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> >> > Kyotaro-san's suggestion isn't bad, though I might shorten it to
>> >> > error_action {error|ignore|log} (or perhaps "stop" instead of "error")?
>> >> > You will need a separate parameter anyway to specify the destination
>> >> > of "log", unless "none" became an illegal table name when I wasn't
>> >> > looking. I don't buy that one parameter that has some special values
>> >> > while other values could be names will be a good design. Moreover,
>> >> > what if we want to support (say) log-to-file along with log-to-table?
>> >> > Trying to distinguish a file name from a table name without any other
>> >> > context seems impossible.
>> >>
>> >> I've been thinking we can add more values to this option to log errors
>> >> not only to the server logs but also to the error table (not sure
>> >> details but I imagined an error table is created for each table on
>> >> error), without an additional option for the destination name. The
>> >> values would be like error_action {error|ignore|save-logs|save-table}.
>> >>
>> >
>> > another idea:
>> > on_error {error|ignore|other_future_option}
>> > if not specified then by default ERROR.
>> > You can also specify ERROR or IGNORE for now.
>> >
>> > I agree, the parameter "error_action" is better than "location".
>>
>> I'm not sure whether error_action or on_error is better, but either
>> way
>> "error_action error" and "on_error error" seems a bit odd to me.
>> I feel "stop" is better for both cases as Tom suggested.
>
> OK. What about this?
> on_error {stop|ignore|other_future_option}
> where other_future_option might be compound like "file 'copy.log'" or
> "table 'copy_log'".

Thanks, also +1 from me.

--
Regards,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA Group Corporation