Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WAL archiving is enabled

From: "Jacky Leng" <lengjianquan(at)163(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WAL archiving is enabled
Date: 2007-10-16 10:30:10
Message-ID: ff23rf$306b$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

If I run the database under non-archiving mode, and execute the following
command:
alter table t set tablespace tblspc1;
Isn't it possible that the "new t" cann't be recovered?

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-10-16 10:38:26 Re: pgsql: Add sample text search dictionary templates and parsers, to
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2007-10-16 05:30:46 Re: plpgsql: Plan type mismatch error

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-10-16 10:51:17 Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WAL archiving is enabled
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-10-16 05:11:20 Re: V3 protocol is slower than V2