From: | "Usama Dar" <munir(dot)usama(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dragan Zubac" <moroncic(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Stored procedure issue |
Date: | 2007-12-02 20:39:14 |
Message-ID: | ff0e67090712021239m117a31a9s81bea9172b41c65c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 2, 2007 7:40 AM, Dragan Zubac <moroncic(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a stored procedure which does the billing stuff
> in our system,it works ok,but if I put in
> production,where there is some 5-10 billing events per
> second,the whole database slows down. It won't even
> drop some test table,reindex,vacuum,things which were
> done before in the blink of an eye. If I stop the
> application which calls the procedure,all is back to
> normal.
>
> We didn't implement any special locking mechanism in
> the procedure,all is default. The procedure is
> updating user's balance in table 'users'. On the other
> hand a couple of 'heavy load' table has foreign keys
> pointing to table 'users'.
>
> Is it the matter of concurency and some locking issue
> or maybe the existing of all those foreign keys
> pointing to table 'users',or maybe something else
> which we're not aware at the moment ?
Can you please post your procedure and explain plan of the SQL which the
procedure uses to do the billing stuff . There can be a zillion reasons for
the performance problems you are seeing, but the email does not provide
enough information.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Pera
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
> with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
--
Usama Munir Dar http://linkedin.com/in/usamadar
Consultant Architect
Cell:+92 321 5020666
Skype: usamadar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Usama Dar | 2007-12-02 20:58:54 | Re: One or more tables? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-12-02 18:49:53 | Re: "relation deleted while in use" encountered with Postgresql 8.0.8 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-02 21:43:14 | Re: There's random access and then there's random access |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-02 19:20:32 | pgsql: Improve the manual's discussion of partitioning. |