Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in postgresql-8.1.18

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in postgresql-8.1.18
Date: 2016-11-14 08:50:01
Message-ID: fe76139a-bbe9-3b6b-ffff-84c6683c7fa2@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/13/2016 11:52 PM, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
>> you can look those relation numbers up in the pg_catalog to see what they are. you can see what the processes are in pg_stat_activity.
> Currently machine is not available. Please suggest if any other approach to identify the same.
>

without access to the system thats generating the error, there's nothing
you can learn.

>> >THis has nothing to do with the growing WAL logs... something is blocking checkpoints if a single WAL file keeps >growing, are you using some form of wal archiving, is that working correctly ? could something
>> >be preventing checkpoints? what are the related checkpoint and WAL settings?
> Many WAL files are generated in pg_xlog directory. I don’t know how I can check checkpoint and WAL settings?
> By default setting of postgresql.conf is used.

I just noticed, you're talking about postgresql 8.1.18? thats an
unsupported and obsolete version from 2009.

A standalone postgres installation that hasn't been configured for WAL
archiving will normally only generate up to 2*CHECKPOINT_SEGMENTS + 1
wal files of 16MB each (assuming all defaults, thats 7 files). The
obsolete 8.1 documentation on this is here,
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/wal-configuration.html

If you've configured wal archiving, AND this isn't working correctly,
WAL files can stack up indefinitely. See
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tobias Bussmann 2016-11-14 10:36:07 Re: Sequential parallel scan / agg
Previous Message Yogesh Sharma 2016-11-14 07:52:48 Re: Request to share information regarding deadlock in postgresql-8.1.18