From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: renaming "transaction log" |
Date: | 2017-05-03 13:10:57 |
Message-ID: | fe26b296-168a-784f-8a10-db696bc5124d@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/2/17 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Most documentation and error messages still uses the term "transaction
> log" to refer to the write-ahead log. Here is a patch to rename that,
> which I think should be done, to match the xlog -> wal renaming in APIs.
+1 for the idea.
The documentation changes look good to me, but the error message changes
are a random mix of "WAL" and "write-ahead log", even when referring to
the same thing. For example:
- errmsg("could not open transaction log directory \"%s\": %m",
+ errmsg("could not open write-ahead log directory \"%s\": %m",
and:
- fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to remove transaction log directory\n"),
+ fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to remove WAL directory\n"),
It seems like they should be one or the other. I think "write-ahead
log" is good in the documentation since it is more explanatory, but the
error messages should either be all "write-ahead log" or all "WAL".
Personally I favor "WAL" for brevity in the error messages, but I would
be OK with "write-ahead log", too.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2017-05-03 13:14:17 | Re: Error message on missing SCRAM authentication with older clients |
Previous Message | amul sul | 2017-05-03 13:09:15 | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |