| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version? |
| Date: | 2017-07-28 12:22:01 |
| Message-ID: | fd90cca4-db1c-b760-dd17-eafa304020d6@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/27/2017 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I kinda suspect we're not actively testing non-MULTIPLICITY builds
> either. The 5.8.7 test I just ran was with a non-MULTIPLICITY build,
> so the case doesn't seem actively broken, but I doubt there is any
> buildfarm coverage. I wonder if it'd be worth getting the buildfarm
> to log the output of "perl -V" so we could get a clearer picture
> of what's being tested.
>
It's quite possible, but in general it will need a new buildfarm client release. If you choose a few possibly critical animals we can ask the owners to apply a fairly simple patch.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-07-28 13:27:37 | Re: LP_DEAD hinting and not holding on to a buffer pin on leaf page (Was: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench) |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2017-07-28 12:12:03 | Re: Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c |