From: | "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: REPOST: Nested loops row estimates always too high |
Date: | 2007-09-24 18:12:01 |
Message-ID: | fd8ukj$s38$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Has anyone offered any answers to you? No one else has replied to this post.
"Ow Mun Heng" <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com> wrote in message
news:1190616376(dot)17050(dot)51(dot)camel(at)neuromancer(dot)home(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 11:02 -0400, Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>> (SORRY FOR THE REPOST, I DON'T SEE MY ORIGINAL QUESTION OR ANY ANSWERS
>> HERE)
>>
>> I am noticing that my queries are spending a lot of time in nested loops.
>> The table/index row estimates are not bad, but the nested loops can be
>> off
>> by a factor of 50. In any case, they are always too high.
>>
>> Are the over-estimations below significant, and if so, is this an
>> indication
>> of a general configuration problem?
> Sounds much like the issue I was seeing as well.
>
>>
>> Unique (cost=67605.91..67653.18 rows=4727 width=16) (actual
>> time=8634.618..8637.918 rows=907 loops=1)
>
> You can to rewrite the queries to individual queries to see it if helps.
>
> In my case, I was doing
>
> select a.a,b.b,c.c from
> (select a from x where) a <--- Put as a SRF
> left join (
> select b from y where ) b <--- Put as a SRF
> on a.a = b.a
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlo Stonebanks | 2007-09-24 19:37:41 | Acceptable level of over-estimation? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-09-24 17:55:22 | Re: Searching for the cause of a bad plan |