Re: [PoC] Delegating pg_ident to a third party

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Delegating pg_ident to a third party
Date: 2021-12-17 09:06:05
Message-ID: fd6b690e-7eea-3789-3341-4e9de5be31e7@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 17.12.21 00:48, Jacob Champion wrote:
> WDYT? (My responses here will be slower than usual. Hope you all have a
> great end to the year!)

Looks interesting. I wonder whether putting this into pg_ident.conf is
sensible. I suspect people will want to eventually add more features
around this, like automatically creating roles or role memberships, at
which point pg_ident.conf doesn't seem appropriate anymore. Should we
have a new file for this? Do you have any further ideas?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jakub Wartak 2021-12-17 09:10:30 RE: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2021-12-17 08:26:42 Re: row filtering for logical replication