| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user |
| Date: | 2010-05-24 13:30:01 |
| Message-ID: | fca84a02124e1ffc7879dd0e5c7c2c7e@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> In light of the proposed purging scheme, how would it be able to distinguish
> between those two cases (nothing there yet vs. was there but purged)?
> There is a difference between an empty result set and an exception.
No, I meant how will the *function* know, if a superuser and/or some
background process can purge records at any time?
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201005240928
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAkv6f0UACgkQvJuQZxSWSsh0xwCgmXLtKngoBBYX0TxDM2TlJRId
AVIAoMHYa3c9Ej2vUJyFufxBR5vDPzQ+
=e1mh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-05-24 13:30:13 | Re: Idea for getting rid of VACUUM FREEZE on cold pages |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-24 13:28:46 | Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) |