| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Meson build updates |
| Date: | 2023-06-29 11:18:21 |
| Message-ID: | fc86a216-4827-be14-2468-7309ea189f67@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.06.23 22:47, Tristan Partin wrote:
> Forgot that I had gotten a review from a Meson maintainer. The last two
> patches in this set are new. One is just a simple spelling correction.
I have committed patches 0001-0006, 0008, 0010, 0013, 0014, 0016, which
are all pretty much cosmetic.
The following patches are now still pending further review:
v5-0007-Tie-adding-C-support-to-the-llvm-Meson-option.patch
v5-0009-Remove-return-code-check.patch
v5-0011-Pass-feature-option-through-to-required-kwarg.patch
v5-0012-Make-finding-pkg-config-python3-more-robust.patch
v5-0015-Clean-up-some-usage-of-Meson-features.patch
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2023-06-29 11:23:22 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-06-29 11:17:49 | Re: Does a cancelled REINDEX CONCURRENTLY need to be messy? |