From: | Tomas Pospisek <tpo2(at)sourcepole(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port |
Date: | 2023-05-02 19:15:08 |
Message-ID: | fc7edc62-79f8-74c5-cfb8-08ddca84d32b@sourcepole.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 02.05.23 12:13, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:43 AM sujay kadam <sujaykadam02(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi PostgreSQL Team,
>>
>>
>> I want to enable SSL in PostgreSQL Database on a new port.
>>
>> I don’t want the default port that is 5432 SSL enabled, but I want to configure another port to enable SSL on it.
>>
>> As per my requirement, I cannot use the same port for normal connection and SSL connection.
>>
>> Hence, we require a new port to be SSL enabled.
>>
>>
>> Please guide us with proper information and links to achieve the above task.
>
> That is now how SSL in PostgreSQL works. It will always run on the
> same port, and PostgreSQL will only listen on one port.
>
> You can probably do some hacky solution to it by running something
> like pgbouncer on a different port and enable SSL only in that one.
> But it will be a hack. I would recommend instead reviewing your
> requirements and see if you can make them work with how PostgreSQL is
> designed.
Oh, I think your idea to use pgbouncer to take care of the SSL
termination is elegant. I don't think me I'd characterize it as a hack
if properly set up. Why do you consider it a hack?
*t
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Sargent | 2023-05-02 19:25:13 | Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port |
Previous Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2023-05-02 17:57:59 | Re: libpq and multi-threading |