| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative |
| Date: | 2018-03-06 20:11:08 |
| Message-ID: | fc7d73cb-d767-fc2b-3a65-6fafe67b2a55@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/4/18 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Do I think this patch is realistic to target for v11? Well. Given where we
> are in the cycle, I don’t think any new TLS implementation going in is
> realistic at this point since none of the proposed ones have had enough tyre
> kicking done. That might change should there be lots of interest and work
> started soon, but as has been discussed elsewhere recently the project has
> limited resources. I have time to work on this, and support reviewers of it,
> but that’s only piece of the puzzle.
I think it would be best if both this patch and the GnuTLS patch are
moved to the next CF and are attacked early in the PG12 cycle.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-06 20:13:46 | Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-06 19:56:41 | Re: [HACKERS] [Patch] Log SSL certificate verification errors |