Re: very large tables

From: Laurent Wandrebeck <l(dot)wandrebeck(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: very large tables
Date: 2009-05-25 09:32:35
Message-ID: fc593b510905250232x29cccddbr624a9aa18297a22b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello,

I'd try to use postgis ( http://postgis.refractions.net ), that allows
you to geolocalize your data. We use such an extention here for the
same kind of data you use. It will lighten up table size, and queries.
Otherwise, partitioning and cluster are good things to do. I would
increase default_statistics_target too. Up to 400, maybe ?
I don't know how/what for you analyse data, here we've clustered on time.

HTH.
Laurent

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message queries 2009-05-25 09:58:14 Java Gui for Postgress
Previous Message Matthew Brand 2009-05-25 09:17:56 Re: very large tables