| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: alternative to PG_CATCH |
| Date: | 2019-11-04 10:17:25 |
| Message-ID: | fc203f54-b56a-da1e-549d-2ab6621bdb1d@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-11-02 15:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> I hadn't actually tested this patch before commit, but now that
> it's in, I'm seeing assorted compiler warnings:
I've fixed the ones that I could reproduce on CentOS 6. I haven't seen
any on a variety of newer systems.
It's not clear why only a handful of cases cause warnings, but my guess
is that the functions are above some size/complexity threshold beyond
which those older compilers give up doing a full analysis.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-11-04 10:26:00 | Re: cost based vacuum (parallel) |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2019-11-04 10:16:48 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |