Re: warning in twophase.c

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: warning in twophase.c
Date: 2017-04-25 07:21:53
Message-ID: fc1f88a8-0b19-3367-47bb-dd2b41fa7511@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/04/25 16:16, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:
> I have also been seeing this warning lately, I had tried to check git log,
> and
> seems like following commit 546c13e11b29 by Simon has introduced it.
>
> But per the commit log, this seems to be a temporary arrangement:
>
> commit 546c13e11b29a5408b9d6a6e3cca301380b47f7f
> Author: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
> Date: Sun Apr 23 22:12:01 2017 +0100
>
> Workaround for RecoverPreparedTransactions()
>
> Force overwriteOK = true while we investigate deeper fix
>
> Proposed by Tom Lane as temporary measure, accepted by me
>
> With latest update on following thread, it seems like Simon has proposed a
> fix that gets rid of flag overwriteOK:
>
> http://www.postgresql-archive.org/StandbyRecoverPreparedTransactions-recovers-subtrans-links-incorrectly-td5957751.html#a5957853

I see, thanks.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-04-25 08:01:03 Re: statement_timeout is not working as expected with postgres_fdw
Previous Message Jeevan Ladhe 2017-04-25 07:16:45 Re: warning in twophase.c