From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer |
Date: | 2024-07-24 18:26:55 |
Message-ID: | fbfe2471-a001-49a6-a15b-3cb33b63e16f@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 24.07.24 20:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut<peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
>> On 24.07.24 16:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm not very thrilled with these changes. It's not apparent why
>>> your compiler is warning about these usages of IsA and not any other
>>> ones,
>> I think one difference is that normally IsA is called on a Node * (since
>> you call IsA to decide what to cast it to), but in this case it's called
>> on a pointer that is already of type ErrorSaveContext *.
> Hmm. But there are boatloads of places where we call IsA on a
> pointer of type Expr *, or sometimes other things. Why aren't
> those triggering the same warning?
It must have to do with the fact that the escontext field in
JsonExprState has the object inline, not as a pointer. AIUI, with
dynamically allocated objects you have more liberties about what type to
interpret them as than with actually declared objects.
If you change the member to a pointer
- ErrorSaveContext escontext;
+ ErrorSaveContext *escontext;
} JsonExprState;
and make the required adjustments elsewhere in the code, the warning
goes away.
This arrangement would also appear to be more consistent with other
executor nodes (e.g., ExprState, ExprEvalStep), so it might be worth it
for consistency in any case.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-24 18:29:45 | Re: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-07-24 18:10:45 | Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates |