From: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in Windows console and Ctrl-C |
Date: | 2014-06-30 19:28:03 |
Message-ID: | fbaa1658575b4a2facf53359225b3d52@AMSPR06MB134.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* From: Noah Misch [mailto:noah(at)leadboat(dot)com]
> I liked the proposal here; was there a problem with it?
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-
> id/CA+TgmoZ3aKE4EnCTmQmZSyKC_0pjL_u4C_x47GE48uY1upBNxg(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
You're referring to the suggestion of accepting and ignoring the option on
non-Windows, right? I can do that, I just don't see the point as long as
pg_ctl has a separate code path (well, #ifdef) for Windows anyway.
> The pg_upgrade test suite and the $(prove_check)-based test suites rely on
> their pg_ctl-started postmasters receiving any console ^C. pg_ctl
> deserves a --foreground or --no-background option for callers that prefer
> the current behavior. That, or those tests need a new way to launch the
> postmaster.
Ah. More good news. Just to confirm, this is only about the tests, right,
not the code they are testing?
If so, is there even a way to run either on Windows? The pg_upgrade test
suite is a shell script, and prove_check is defined in Makefile.global and
definitely not applicable to Windows.
--
Christian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2014-06-30 20:10:39 | Re: PATCH: Allow empty targets in unaccent dictionary |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-30 19:19:17 | Re: PATCH: Allow empty targets in unaccent dictionary |