From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: XMLNAMESPACES (was Re: Clarification of nodeToString() use cases) |
Date: | 2018-09-17 12:31:30 |
Message-ID: | fb75e253-2443-9e95-4151-1aec9914e477@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/16/2018 11:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 09/16/2018 02:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The change the attached patch makes is to represent a DEFAULT namespace
>>> as a NULL list entry, rather than a T_String Value node containing a
>>> null.
>> Seems related to this CF item that's been around for a year:
>> <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAFj8pRB%2BWDyDcZyGmfRdJ0HOoXugeaL-KNFeK9YA5Z10JN9qfA%40mail.gmail.com>
>> ?
> Hm, seems like that is operating at the next level down; it starts with
> XmlTableSetNamespace's response to a null "name" argument, whereas what
> I'm on about is what happens before we get to that function.
>
> There's quite a bit I don't like about that patch now that I look at it
> :-(, but I don't think it's relevant to this thread.
>
>
OK, good. Please do add your comments to the appropriate thread and
change the CF status if required.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-09-17 12:44:36 | Re: Stored procedures and out parameters |
Previous Message | Alexander Kukushkin | 2018-09-17 12:25:56 | Re: Connection slots reserved for replication |