Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro

From: Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro
Date: 2022-12-31 18:06:49
Message-ID: fb4be3ca-45cd-998a-6843-e70a0ffb50c3@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 31/12/22 23:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ankit Kumar Pandey <itsankitkp(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> This is in reference to BUG #5705 and corresponding todo item: Fix
>> /contrib/btree_gist's implementation of inet indexing
>> I am not able to repro this issue.
> You didn't test it right: the complaint is about the btree_gist
> extension, not the in-core inet opclass, which didn't even
> exist when this bug was filed. AFAICS btree_gist is still
> broken. See
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/201010112055.o9BKtZf7011251%40wwwmaster.postgresql.org
>
> The commit message for f23a5630e may also be informative:
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=f23a5630e
>
> regards, tom lane

Hi,

Sorry I missed this. Thanks for the pointer, I will check this again
properly.

--
Regards,
Ankit Kumar Pandey

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ankit Kumar Pandey 2022-12-31 19:43:24 [PATCH] Add overlaps geometric operators that ignore point overlaps
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-31 18:02:31 Re: Request for removal of BUG #5705 from todo items as no repro