Re: Replication protocol doc fix

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication protocol doc fix
Date: 2021-07-30 21:55:29
Message-ID: fb4bc37c77e8dbf8a238737207c1340a3e326cf5.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 08:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Right, that seems like a good goal. Thinking about this a little
> more,
> it's only holding off *cancel* interrupts, not *all* interrupts, so
> presumably you can still terminate the backend in this state. That's
> not so bad, and it's not clear how we could do any better. So I
> withdraw my previous complaint about this point.

Further thoughts on this? I don't feel comfortable making this change
without a stronger endorsement.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-07-30 22:01:44 Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-07-30 21:49:09 Re: [PATCH] Hooks at XactCommand level