From: | Postgres Learner <postgres(dot)learner(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Fwd: 8.0 vs. 7.4 benchmarks |
Date: | 2004-12-07 09:17:58 |
Message-ID: | fb46776d04120701175115730f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi all!
I posted this on pgsql-performance but got no reply, so here it is:
thanks!
ps
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Postgres Learner <postgres(dot)learner(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:58:46 +0530
Subject: 8.0 vs. 7.4 benchmarks
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Hi all!
Has anyone done any performance benchmarking of postgresql 7.4 vs 8.0?
Are there any scenarios where 8.0 can be expected to be faster?
I would love to get my hands on any numbers that someone might have.
Also does anyone know how long it will take for a stable release of
8.0 to come (any estimates would be good) ?
Given the loads of additional features in 8.0, I can't
wait to use it in production. :-)
thanks a lot everyone!!!
ps
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-12-07 09:28:49 | Re: Triggers don't activate when dropping table |
Previous Message | Werdin Jens | 2004-12-07 08:55:42 | Re: Index on geometry and timestamp |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2004-12-07 11:08:38 | Re: pg_restore taking 4 hours! |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-12-07 08:03:08 | Re: Config review |