From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tomohiro hiramitsu <hiramit(dot)tm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, skoposov(at)ed(dot)ac(dot)uk, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16722: PG hanging on COPY when table has close to 2^32 toasts in the table. |
Date: | 2021-03-18 16:32:29 |
Message-ID: | fb3f67af-f23c-63aa-0c21-fb1c67dfaeef@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2021/03/17 14:30, tomohiro hiramitsu wrote:
> v4-0001-GetNewOidWithIndex_log_output.patch
Thanks for updating the patch! I applied the following and cosmetic changes
to the patch. Attached is the updated version of the patch.
+ ereport(LOG,
+ (errmsg("still finding an unused OID within relation \"%s\"",
+ ereport(LOG,
+ (errmsg("the new OID has been assigned in relation \"%s\" after \"%llu\" retries",
WARNING is more suitable for these kinds of messages?
I changed the log level here to WARNING.
+#define GETNEWOID_NOTIFY_MINVAL 1000000
+#define GETNEWOID_NOTIFY_MAXVAL 100000000
If we use WARNING, GETNEWOID_WARN_THRESHOLD and GETNEWOID_WARN_MAX_INTERVAL
sound better to me for the meanings of them. I renamed them.
+ if (retry_count >= GETNEWOID_NOTIFY_MINVAL)
">=" should be ">"? Otherwise, the message for completion of OID assignment
can be logged even when no message "still finding ..." is output. I fixed this.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-GetNewOidWithIndex_log_output.patch | text/plain | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-03-18 21:56:39 | Re: BUG #16927: Postgres can`t access WAL files |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-03-18 14:15:05 | BUG #16933: [build-system] libpq doesn't check for every names of zlib |