| From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
| Date: | 2007-08-24 22:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | fanl80$c3q$1@sea.gmane.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alexander Staubo wrote on 24.08.2007 23:49:
>>> So actually the remark shouldn't be that "the multi-threaded
>>> architecture is only advantageous on Windows", but more like "the
>>> multi-process architecture is disadvantageous on Windows and hence a
>>> multi-threaded architecture is preferred (on that particular OS)".
>> Yeah - but I'm not sure thats necessarily something that should have a
>> place on a bullet point comparison.
>
> You solve it by letting the category be labeled "Process/thread
> architecture", and letting the columns say "Thread-based" for Firebird
> and "Process-based" for PostgreSQL respectively.
To my understanding Firebird offers a choice between thread-based (Superserver)
and process-based (Classic) at least on the Windows platform.
Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-08-24 22:14:30 | Re: Add Column BEFORE/AFTER another column |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-24 21:52:40 | Re: lc_collate issue |