From: | "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "Alexey Kondratov" <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | RE: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit |
Date: | 2021-01-21 05:45:18 |
Message-ID: | fae6fb62365447638e4ae73169ab3766@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Attaching v15 patch set. Please consider it for further review.
Hi
I have some comments for the 0001 patch
In v15-0001-postgres_fdw-function-to-discard-cached-connecti
1.
+ If there is no open connection to the given foreign server, <literal>false</literal>
+ is returned. If no foreign server with the given name is found, an error
Do you think it's better add some testcases about:
call postgres_fdw_disconnect and postgres_fdw_disconnect_all when there is no open connection to the given foreign server
2.
+ /*
+ * For the given server, if we closed connection or it is still in
+ * use, then no need of scanning the cache further.
+ */
+ if (entry->server_hashvalue == hashvalue &&
+ (entry->xact_depth > 0 || result))
+ {
+ hash_seq_term(&scan);
+ break;
+ }
If I am not wrong, is the following condition always true ?
(entry->xact_depth > 0 || result)
Best regards,
houzj
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-01-21 05:46:19 | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-01-21 05:21:27 | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |